Bombay HC Relief: No GST on Transfer of Development Rights in Development Agreements

In a significant win for the real estate sector, the Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) quashed a GST demand issued to M/S Shrinivasa Realcon Private Ltd.. The court clarified that rights granted to a developer to build on a property do not automatically qualify as taxable "Transfer of Development Rights" (TDR) under GST laws.

4/20/20261 min read

A yellow excavator stands near city buildings.
A yellow excavator stands near city buildings.

In a significant win for the real estate sector, the Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) quashed a GST demand issued to M/S Shrinivasa Realcon Private Ltd.. The court clarified that rights granted to a developer to build on a property do not automatically qualify as taxable "Transfer of Development Rights" (TDR) under GST laws.

Case Background

  • The Agreement: On January 7, 2022, M/S Shrinivasa Realcon entered into an agreement with a landowner to construct a multi-storied complex in Nagpur.

  • The Dispute: CGST authorities issued a show-cause notice demanding GST under the Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM). They argued the transaction fell under Entry 5B of Notification No. 13/2017, which covers the transfer of TDR or Floor Space Index (FSI).

  • Petitioner's Stand: The company argued that no TDR or FSI was actually "purchased" or "sold"; they were simply granted the right to develop the property using its existing FSI.

Key Findings by the High Court

The court, in its judgment on April 8, 2025, made several critical observations:

  • Definition of TDR: It distinguished between general development rights and specific "Transferable Development Rights" as defined by Maharashtra’s Unified Development Control and Promotion Regulations.

  • Entry 5B Inapplicability: The court held that the rights a developer derives from an owner to construct a building—in exchange for permitting the developer to sell certain units—are not the same as the TDR/FSI contemplated for taxation under Entry 5B.

  • No Actual Transfer: Since no TDR or FSI was purchased from a third party, the transaction did not trigger the GST liability claimed by the department.

Impact on the Real Estate Industry

This ruling provides much-needed clarity for developers and landowners entering into Joint Development Agreements (JDA). It reinforces that GST should only apply when there is an actual, taxable transfer of development rights, preventing tax authorities from overreaching in standard development arrangements.