How Much Cash Can You Deposit in Your Savings Account Before the Taxman Asks Questions?

The period following demonetisation in 2016 brought unprecedented attention to cash deposits made by individuals. Many taxpayers received notices asking them to explain their deposits, even when the amounts were small and came from routine household savings.

To bring clarity, the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) issued Instruction No. 03/2017, which continues to be one of the most widely quoted directions for cash-deposit verifications under Operation Clean Money. The instruction plays a crucial role in protecting individuals—especially those without business income—from unnecessary scrutiny.

In this article, we unpack what the instruction says, how it is applied, and why courts and tribunals often delete additions made by Assessing Officers (AOs) for cash deposits up to ₹2.5 lakh.

What CBDT Instruction No. 03/2017 Says:

• For individuals with no business income, cash deposits up to ₹2.5 lakh (during the demonetisation window of 09 November 2016 to 30 December 2016) should not be subjected to detailed verification.

• For senior citizens above 70 years of age, this threshold increases to ₹5 lakh.

• These deposits may be considered as coming from household savings, earlier withdrawals, or other legitimate personal sources, unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.

The intention behind the instruction is straightforward: small cash holdings with individuals should not be treated as suspicious by default.

Why This Matters: No Automatic Addition to Income

A common misconception is that cash deposits below ₹2.5 lakh are automatically exempt from tax. That is not the case. What the instruction ensures is that:

• Assessing Officers should not automatically treat such deposits as unexplained income.

• No further verification is required unless there is specific, credible information suggesting that the funds came from undisclosed sources.

• The burden of explanation on the taxpayer is lighter for deposits within this limit.

In practical assessments, this means that such deposits are generally not added to the taxpayer’s income, especially when the person is a salaried individual, housewife, or someone without business turnover.

Tribunal Decisions Supporting the Instruction

Over the years, various benches of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) have relied on this CBDT instruction to provide relief to taxpayers. A few notable trends include:

1. Housewives’ Savings Accepted

Tribunals have deleted additions where housewives deposited cash of ₹2 lakh–₹2.5 lakh during demonetisation, recognising these amounts as accumulated household savings.

2. Additions Struck Down for Following SOP Improperly

Instruction 03/2017 contains a detailed Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for verifying cash deposits.

Where AOs failed to follow this SOP—such as issuing generic notices without enquiry—ITATs have struck down the additions.

3. Partial Relief When Deposits Exceed Limit

In cases where deposits slightly exceeded ₹2.5 lakh, ITATs have sometimes restricted additions only to the excess amount, citing CBDT’s thresholds as a reasonable benchmark.

These judicial trends reinforce that Instruction 03/2017 is binding on the department and cannot be ignored during assessments.

⸻

Important Caveats

While the instruction offers significant relief, certain limitations must be understood:

• It applies specifically to demonetisation-period deposits.

• It benefits individuals with no business income the most.

• Large or frequent deposits beyond the threshold may still invite scrutiny.

• The instruction does not provide exemption from tax; it only guides verification procedure.

Why the Instruction Still Matters Today

Even years after demonetisation, many assessments, reopenings, and faceless proceedings still address cash deposit cases from 2016. CBDT’s instruction remains the primary defence for taxpayers with small deposits, especially since tribunals continue to follow it strictly.

For professionals such as CAs, tax consultants, and lawyers, Instruction 03/2017 is an essential part of any representation involving cash deposits.

Conclusion

CBDT Instruction 03/2017 brings much-needed clarity for individuals who made small cash deposits during demonetisation. By setting a threshold of ₹2.5 lakh (₹5 lakh for senior citizens), it protects genuine taxpayers from unnecessary investigations. Courts and tribunals have consistently upheld this principle, ensuring that such deposits are not casually added to income.

If you are facing scrutiny over a similar cash deposit, this instruction—and the judicial support behind it—offers a strong and reliable defence.